ATSpro vs Bullhorn
Bullhorn is a powerful enterprise platform. It's also expensive to buy, slow to implement, and built around a module model that charges extra for things UK agencies actually need. Here's an honest side-by-side.
Bullhorn's pricing is opaque by design.
There's no public pricing because the real cost only becomes clear after an enterprise sales process — licence fees, setup fees, module fees, and annual contracts. Most UK agencies end up paying £120–200+ per user per month once you account for the modules you actually need.
The modules model means you pay again for things that should be included.
Compliance tools, AI matching, job board distribution — these are usually sold as separate packages in Bullhorn. In ATSpro, everything is in the £49 licence. No decisions about which modules to enable.
Implementation takes months and costs thousands.
A typical Bullhorn implementation for a small UK agency involves a consultancy engagement, custom configuration, and training. By the time you're live, you've spent more than a year of ATSpro licences on setup alone.
Bullhorn's AI is read-only. ATSpro's AI acts.
Bullhorn has added AI summaries and insights. ATSpro's AI assistant goes a step further — it takes real actions. Send an email, chase a reference, create a job, report on revenue — all from a chat interface. That's a fundamentally different capability.
Feature by feature: ATSpro vs Bullhorn
Bullhorn pricing is estimated from publicly available sources and customer reports. Actual pricing varies by contract size and configuration. ATSpro pricing is fixed at £49/user/month, all features included.
Free migration from Bullhorn to ATSpro
We will migrate your candidates, companies, contacts, jobs, and placement history at no cost. Book a 30-minute call to map out exactly what the migration looks like for your data — see also the pricing page for what is included at £49/user.
No credit card required · Full access from day one
ATSpro vs Bullhorn FAQs
Also comparing recruitment CRMs?